SWTJC/ RGC - Evaluating Sources and Tutorials


TILT - Texas Information Literacy Tutorial

BareBones - Information Tutorial

Evaluating Internet Resources

Evaluating Sources from the Owl Online Writing Lab at Purdue


Note: Passwords are available to currently registered students of Southwest Texas Junior College and Rio Grande College, SRSU for off-campus access to some databases. Ask for this information at any one of the three libraries. For more information, call 830-591-7367, or email.



  Library Home

 

 Evaluating Internet Resources  

Summary of the CARS Checklist for Research Source Evaluation

Credibility

trustworthy source, author’s credentials, evidence of quality control, known or respected authority, organizational support. Goal: an authoritative source, a source that supplies some good evidence that allows you to trust it.

Accuracy

up to date, factual, detailed, exact, comprehensive, audience and purpose reflect intentions of completeness and accuracy. Goal: a source that is correct today (not yesterday), a source that gives the whole truth.

Reasonableness

fair, balanced, objective, reasoned, no conflict of interest, absence of fallacies or slanted tone. Goal: a source that engages the subject thoughtfully and reasonably, concerned with the truth.

Support

listed sources, contact information, available corroboration, claims supported, documentation supplied. Goal: a source that provides convincing evidence for the claims made, a source you can triangulate (find at least two other sources that support it).

     Top of Page                         Library Home 

 

Living with Information: The CAFE Advice

Here is one last piece of advice to help you live well in the world of information: Take your information to the Café (Challenge, Adapt, File, Evaluate).

Challenge

Challenge information and demand accountability. Stand right up to the information and ask questions. Who says so? Why do they say so? Why was this information created? Why should I believe it? Why should I trust this source? How is it known to be true? Is it the whole truth? Is the argument reasonable? Who supports it?

 Adapt

Adapt your skepticism and requirements for quality to fit the importance of the information and what is being claimed. Require more credibility and evidence for stronger claims. You are right to be a little skeptical of dramatic information or information that conflicts with commonly accepted ideas. The new information may be true, but you should require a robust amount of evidence from highly credible sources.

   File

File new information in your mind rather than immediately believing or disbelieving it. Avoid premature closure. Do not jump to a conclusion or come to a decision too quickly. It is fine simply to remember that someone claims XYZ to be the case. You need not worry about believing or disbelieving the claim right away. Wait until more information comes in, you have time to think about the issue, and you gain more general knowledge.

  Evaluate

Evaluate and re-evaluate regularly. New information or changing circumstances will affect the accuracy and hence your evaluation of previous information. Recognize the dynamic, fluid nature of information. The saying, "Change is the only constant," applies to much information, especially in technology, science, medicine, and business.

Both the CARS Checklist and The CAFE Advice came from http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm by Robert Harris, Copyright 1997.

     Top of Page                       Library Home